Research

What makes physical task data trainable?

A video can show that work happened without showing an AI system how the work was done. Physical training data needs the action, the state around it, the reason for each decision, and the result that followed.

This note describes the collection principles we use to turn real work into structured learning material. It presents a framework, not a model benchmark.

A task is more than a clip

Useful capture keeps the demonstration aligned with synchronized context. Camera views, tool state, timing, instructions, and outcomes need a shared clock. Without that alignment, important details become guesswork during training.

Figure 1. One shared clock keeps what the operator intended, observed, did, and achieved usable as a single training trace.

Variation needs a reason

More footage is not automatically more coverage. Variation should map to changes that affect the task, including operator technique, environment, object state, tool choice, and failure mode. Each dimension needs a reason to exist in the collection plan.

Figure 2. The collection plan puts effort into variation that changes how the task is performed.

Review belongs inside collection

Quality review works best when it can send precise feedback back to capture teams. Missing state, unclear intent, unsafe execution, and incomplete outcomes can then be corrected before they become permanent gaps in a dataset.

Figure 3. Review catches missing context before collection cost scales.

Figures use illustrative values.

Tell us the capability your model is missing.

Describe the task, the setting, and what success looks like. We design the collection around it and deliver the data in your schema.